Blog Home » Voices from the Frontlines

Sexual violence as a peacetime-wartime continuum

1 May 2013 3 Comments

A women’s shelter for victims of sexual abuse in Goma. Image Credit: UN Photo//Marie Frechon

Kirthi Jayakumar

“Wartime gender discrimination and violence is proof of a prevalent undercurrent of socio-cultural dynamics that speak of gender discrimination in peacetime.”


That gender-based and sexual violence is a weapon of war, and a painfully common occurrence in nearly every warfront, is a fact. What is obscure, and perhaps little considered in the strategies developed to tackle sexual violence, is that it is as rooted in peacetime as it is in wartime. Gender violence is ubiquitous and exists as a phenomenon in a continuum of sorts between peacetime and wartime.

In both peacetime and wartime, the occurrence of gender violence is a representation of the dominance and aggression that men assert over women, and of the fact that the bodies of women are focal points for aggressive discrimination based on sex. The only difference between both situations lies in the proportion.

In peacetime, scattered or episodic instances of violence take place. The bodies are individual, in that the cases are separate incidents and rape is not pursued as a policy of dominance. In wartime, the scale and proportion extend beyond this limit, where bodies become ‘social bodies,’ with the number of events taking place tolling much higher – both as a matter of a policy of dominance, and by any and every person.

Wartime gender discrimination and violence are proof of a prevalent undercurrent of socio-cultural dynamics that speak of gender discrimination in peacetime. This is precisely the reason for the “effectiveness” of gender violence in war in breaking a nation’s social order. If there were no prevalent concepts in peacetime of honour, shame, sexuality, sacredness of virginity, and modesty, gender violence could not function so effectively in war. The surrounding element of cultural salience in wartime surrounding a woman’s honour is a reflection of the connotations that sexuality has in peacetime.

The dynamics of male dominance stem from the notions surrounding the protection of female honour, which in turn, is inherent in many traditional cultures. Most countries that have remained thriving hotbeds of impunity with gender violence in wartime are those that are peppered with a sanctimonious perception of women as sex objects in peacetime.

By “sex objects,” the connotation intends to convey that women are representatives of the code of honour of their families and the code of honour of their blood and lineage. This in turn leads to the augmented sanctity attached to the virginity, chastity, honour, and virtue of a woman. Women themselves are brought up with the preconditioning that their honour and avoidance of shame are non-negotiable elements for their acceptance in society. A woman is deemed the representation of the honour of the three-tiered hierarchy that commands her life: her husband, her family, and the community or province she represents.

Given the importance of and emphasis upon a woman’s chastity, monogamy, and fertility in peacetime, it is understandable why women become the critical targets of enemy combatants in a state of war. An act of violence against women is a means for combatants to show their control over the “sexual property” in a conflict.

Sexual violence in peacetime is often construed as crimes against the individual, while in war the very same offences gain greater magnitude. The continued subsistence of a culture of silence in peacetime is a springboard for the unhindered occurrence of violence against women in war. In effect, therefore, bodies don’t turn into battlegrounds when peace changes to war, but remain battlegrounds through peace and war. The lack of peace at home and at the grassroots snowballs into the lack of peace in the nation, and the lack of peace across the world.


This article was originally posted by Insight Conflict.

Follow Peace X Peace on Twitter (@PeaceXPeace)

Join our mailing list for weekly peacebuilding stories.

The views and opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Peace X day delivery cialis

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
3 Comments to “Sexual violence as a peacetime-wartime continuum”
  1. Daniel S. Moskwitz says:

    I tell my closest Syrian friend, that we need more TRANSPERSONAL PSYCHOLOGY. More Authentic, Local Community Development. If there is so much Alienation, Individualism and such an Impersonal Society along with a Proliferation of Pornography and Women being used to Advertise Expensive Products, of course, there is going to be a lot of Violence against Women. However, if we can Tame down this “Individualism”, as Rigoberta Menchus suggests and have more Authentic, Direct Dialogue among ordinary people, Men are likely to LOSE INTEREST in Sexual IMAGES and just want to Interact with Real People. People, in general, really LOVE all their Material things, but the Idea that Nihilism, such as the Current Genocide in SYRIA, is really an INHERENT PART of the Capitlist System is not Something they want to think about.

  2. Daniel S. Moskwitz says:

    Sorry, That’s “Rigoberta MENCHU”….not Menchus. Maybe, we could use some more People around here LIKE Rigoberta Menchu, but “Menchu” is the Correct Spelling of the Last Name.

  3. Sandra says:

    There is need for more emphasis that violence against women during peace time is same as violence against women during war.
    One of the major targets i am fighting for in Nigeria is for us to have at least one gender based violence center in every local government.
    Women go through a whole lot and yet it goes unreported, hence no data especially in the Niger delta region where they practice Myra syndrome ( A culture where the first daughters of every family in ogoni land do not marry and can procreate with different men).
    i quite appreciate this article and will circulate.

Leave a Reply